Intel NUC8i3PNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i3PNH
MotherboardIntel NUC8i3PNB  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 13 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 203
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 300
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel(8086 2082) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2120G 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 149 160 159 164 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 465
Write 189
Mixed 222
SusWrite 158
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 26.8
108% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 75.9
100% 186 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-015.A00G 99U5700-027.A00G 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.6% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8i3PNB Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i3PNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback