Lenovo 20MVS16U00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20MVS16U00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MVS16U00
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '22 at 13:10
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 108
45% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 159
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 5122) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.9
3% 7.07 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 229 223 215 238 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 500
Write 507
Mixed 443
SusWrite 251
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 23.7
72% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 172
137% 196 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 271%
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
359GB free
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 310 486 447 519 564 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 235
Write 358
Mixed 517
SusWrite 457
89% 392 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 18.1
57% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 175
131% 180 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 219%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16S4/16G KHX2400C14S4/16G 32GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20MVS16U00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20MVS16U00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback