Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '22 at 03:35
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 136
53% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 215
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 40.5
35% 42 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 27.7
29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC500R480G 480GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SCEK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 162 206 247 255 247 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
Read 328
Write 401
Mixed 312
SusWrite 232
72% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 32.4
117% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 189
143% 192 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 101%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 84 87 86 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 79.8
Write 80.5
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 85
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback