Medion MD35151

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35151  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B560H6-EM2
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 11 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 151
2-Core 292
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 886
84% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 9630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.35
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 173
Parallax 172
152% 177 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 141
Splatting 121
119% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12S-512G-PHISON-SSD-BICS4 512GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1122 733 743 714 711 712 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 2,279
Mixed 1,572
SusWrite 789
344% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 66
255% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 1,152
871% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 236%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 25.3
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35151 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Medion MD35151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback