TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '22 at 00:57
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 847
76% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,286
80% 1,286 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 77.3%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 132
Parallax 130
117% 135 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 104
Splatting 100
93% 116 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B- 480GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 101 76 84 36 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 476
Write 350
Mixed 121
SusWrite 91.9
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 9.6
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.1
DQ Write 22.9
DQ Mixed 19.2
14% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 36.1%
 Great: 55%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
132GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 91 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 68.9
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 89.9
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 54.1%
 Great: 64%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
63GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 83 84 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 87.5
Write 47.8
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 83.6
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 49.2%
 Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 36.6%
 Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,397x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples689x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples335x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples285x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples282x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples276x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples123x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples122x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples368x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples156x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples146x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback