HP ProLiant DL385p Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP ProLiant DL385p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6274
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 72.9
37% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 188
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 500GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 9 2 9.8 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 73
Write 22.1
Mixed 33
SusWrite 17.3
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 82%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 8.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 35 30 44 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 647651-181 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 5.7
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback