Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 5405U 2,193 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 96.2 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 136 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 187 24% 185 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR054 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 392 395 397 395 397 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 447 Write 387 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 397 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 0.7 43% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 51.1 DQ Mixed 15.5 35% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 92%
Kingston DT 101 G2 16GB 1,946 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 8.8 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 8.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 7.6 12% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 029E0000802C CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	64.9% Good	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 20.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 16.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 53.4 75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	1,128x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	260x
Radeon 520AMDBench 6%, 602 samples	23x

SSD
NVMe TOSHIBA 256GBKbg40zns256gBench 132%, 2,842 samples	69x
NVMe SK hynix 256GBBc501Bench 110%, 8,328 samples	65x
SN520 NVMe WDC 256GBPCBench 137%, 4,380 samples	37x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 7,726 samples	250x
SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 5,660 samples	191x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBUnknownBench 41%, 10,071 samples	62x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16