Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '17 at 02:16
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.7 1-Core 147 2-Core 284 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 792 79% 643 Pts	64-Core 808 50% 808 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800 3,739 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	5.94% Terrible	Lighting 7.93 Reflection 8 Parallax 4.66 6% 6.86 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 6.93 Splatting 4.96 5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.94% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 172GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29514 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2069 (B1) Unknown 90 90 363 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 74 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54480327338	80.2% Excellent	Read 510 Write 356 Mixed 425 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 21 100% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 68 81% 148 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 86%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 30129 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2120 (B1) Unknown 95 95 177 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 50 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 47 (F1) Unknown 99 99 25712992392	51.5% Above average	Read 494 Write 201 Mixed 284 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 9.85 60% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 3.82 13% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 86%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 343GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 180 175 5983 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14442 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 24965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2074 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 515 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 56357 (C2) HDA temperature 122 108 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.9% Average	Read 92 Write 78.1 Mixed 79.9 63% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.21 90% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 753GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 39.7 Mixed 37.1 50% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.3 92% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB 10,297 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 25.4 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 24.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,933x
Core i5-7600KIntel $169Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	773x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	369x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	915x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	788x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	785x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	269x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	269x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	198x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	358x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	290x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	139x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,007

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16