TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive447% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 272
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 978
94% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,530
95% 1,530 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 91.7%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3695 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 227
Parallax 274
181% 241 fps
MRender 290
Gravity 227
Splatting 171
181% 229 fps
Poor: 128% ↑
This bench: 165%
 Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
613GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 48 47 49 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
447% Outstanding
Read 6,990
Write 46.1
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 47.1
372% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 405
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 5.2
622% 138 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑
This bench: 447%
 Great: 311%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.6 7.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7.7
10% 9.28 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.24%
 Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 32
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 90.3%
 Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,397x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples689x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples335x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples285x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples282x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples276x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples123x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples122x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples368x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples156x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples146x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback