HP ProBook 470 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook 470 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2249
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 03:31
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 138
51% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 178
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2249) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 6.7
4% 7 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.5
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 512GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 13 81 41 18 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 468
Write 390
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 88.2
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 1.8
47% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 27
DQ Mixed 20.2
29% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 0711 PSD3L1600C114GVS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.6
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 470 G2 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback