Lenovo 30FA002JUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive389% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30FA002JUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 330E
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i9-12900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 196
2-Core 366
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,298
117% 987 Pts
64-Core 1,446
90% 1,446 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400 4GB
Legend(17AA 1613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 25
Parallax 20.9
18% 22.8 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 23.4
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2971 2805 2803 2157 665 663 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,446
Write 2,767
Mixed 2,529
SusWrite 2,011
550% 2,438 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 108
339% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1,352
1,019% 1,374 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 389%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 54.5
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 31
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 147%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30FA002JUS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 30FA002JUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback