Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory117 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 19:27
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 270
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 1,048
94% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,950
121% 1,950 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 227
Reflection 249
Parallax 223
185% 233 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 180
Splatting 172
149% 184 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 158%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1421 1417 1248 960 907 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 2,098
Mixed 1593
SusWrite 1222
415% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 51.6
192% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,025
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 174
262% 515 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 264%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
399GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1704 1053 683 795 798 800 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2585
Write 1878
Mixed 1722
SusWrite 972
399% 1,789 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 76
245% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 418
395% 638 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 273%
Great: 346%
Sabrent Dual SATA Bridge 1TB
741GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 341 288 372 384 383 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 339
Write 349
Mixed 320
SusWrite 359
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 28.4
92% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 77.8
72% 112 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 170 172 170 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 107%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
508GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 92 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 84.7
Write 88.3
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 90.3
113% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
494GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 108 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 108
133% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 60%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
307GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 34 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 37.5
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 37.8
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 23%
WD Elements 2TB
164GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 18 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Read 18
Write 15.1
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 15.2
21% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 44%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 64GB
37GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 65 58 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 117
Write 56.7
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 67.6
90% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.5
79% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 21.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII HERO (WI-FI) - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback