RM DESKTOP 210

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRM DESKTOP 210  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I/RM/SI
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 18:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 185
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 338
47% 347 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 66.9
56% 69.9 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 65.9
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 200 218 217 68 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 234
Write 219
Mixed 209
SusWrite 162
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 15.9
81% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 89.9
DQ Mixed 19.9
26% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP 210 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: RM DESKTOP 210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback