Lenovo 80Q7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80Q7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Paris 5A8
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 153
58% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 230
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 250 162 115 135 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 440
Write 364
Mixed 367
SusWrite 171
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 28.5
123% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 1.2
74% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ME68FAF1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80Q7 Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80Q7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback