Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 128 53% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 192 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 2.9 3% 2.77 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF8704RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 109 138 124 132 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 176 Write 312 Mixed 129 SusWrite 138 43% 189 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 5.9 38% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 98.1 DQ Write 65.3 DQ Mixed 33.5 38% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68E9W1600 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

SSD
SUV500480G 480GBKingstonBench 81%, 7,138 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
Ultimate SU800 128GBAdata $30Bench 77%, 32,167 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 49%, 416 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 2x4GBMicronBench 44%, 1,622 samples	3x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199