HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9480m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 22DA
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime25.4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 13:51
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 93.1
50% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 150
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 103 100 101 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 341
Write 110
Mixed 189
SusWrite 108
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 32.2
117% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 122
114% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 15.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9480m Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9480m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback