Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A359

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A359  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB67
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 10:34
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 93%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 106
53% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 374
35% 291 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1E26 002D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 7.3
6% 5.97 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDASB8Y-512G-1016 512GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40100016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 287 396 400 401 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 314
Write 250
Mixed 201
SusWrite 364
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 39.2
127% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 206
138% 166 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A359 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A359

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback