Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 34 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 118 38% 70.7 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 238 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.18% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.18% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 2280-512GB SSD 512GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0609B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 355 334 357 327 322 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 377 Write 323 Mixed 336 SusWrite 336 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 17 109% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 49.1 90% 172 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x4GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 12.5 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 232 17% 232 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	491x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	482x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	461x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,370x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16