Asrock H97 Anniversary

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 20:43
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 630
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76% Very good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 92.7
Parallax 88.4
78% 92.1 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 83
Splatting 75.4
73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Z400s 2.5 7MM 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2329012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 166
Mixed 170
59% 272 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 13.3
100% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 78.1
81% 133 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
542GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 104 103 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 104
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Anniversary

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback