| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 10 months ago.
| Motherboard | Biostar X470NH (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20220523 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 06 '22 at 20:06 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | LVA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
88% 161 Pts
|
78% 622 Pts
|
60% 977 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
128%
Outstanding
|
141% 183 fps
|
122% 151 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 134 101 90 117 84 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
80% 359 MB/s
|
192% 67.8 MB/s
|
271% 363 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GFX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
77.2%
Very good
|
78% 27.5 GB/s
|
70% 24.3 GB/s
|
50% 80.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X470NH Builds (Compare 30 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar X470NH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon 200GEAMD $52Bench 54%, 12,631 samples | 4x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 3x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 4x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $301 |