TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z87X-SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-SLI  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 19:36
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 561
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 79.7%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 215
Parallax 207
196% 221 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 159
Splatting 129
140% 178 fps
Poor: 139% ↑
This bench: 162%
 Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 348
Mixed 303
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 7.6
78% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 113
128% 218 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 24.7
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 57.4
33% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 33%
 Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
53GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 79
SusWrite 115
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 64.3%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA160B.C8FK Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 1315 CT25664BA160B.C8FK 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 33.9%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z87X-SLI Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-SLI

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel  $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples26x
Core i5-4670KIntel  $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples17x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples8x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples7x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples7x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples6x
SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung  $65Bench 96%, 217,115 samples8x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples4x
LCS-128M6S 128GBLiteonitBench 76%, 1,777 samples4x
RAM
HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 55%, 367 samples5x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples3x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GBCorsairBench 62%, 641 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback