HP h8-1230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1230  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory4.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120417
Uptime23.5 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6120 Six-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 112
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 264
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Device(1B0A 90B7) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 0.3
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 119GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 36 30 32 29 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 40.9
Write 148
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 41.8
14% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 29.6
25% 33.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ20UF8BDW0-GN-F HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1230 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback