Biostar X570GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar X570GT  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 00:28
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 842
82% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 78.2
77% 87.9 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 72.5
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 83 82 80 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 484
Write 444
Mixed 405
SusWrite 117
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 47.8
164% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 121%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
521GB free
Firmware: AX1P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 92 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 83.8
Write 92.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 89.7
54% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
511GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 170 173 183 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 135
Write 121
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 170
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
305GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 100 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 90.4
Write 96.3
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 100
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 37.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 36.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570GT Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Biostar X570GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $740
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback