Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S0JTR
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 20:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 152
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 208
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 315 306 308 292 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 438
Write 438
Mixed 394
SusWrite 310
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 35.6
114% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 364
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback