Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 124
55% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 273
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2328) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 36
Parallax 48.4
30% 40.5 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 24.6
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 1.81T 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 195 185 205 209 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 222
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 193
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
258% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 13.3
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 13.3
20% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
122% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback