Asus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory247.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 17:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3990X
sTRX4, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,148
101% 860 Pts
64-Core 6,440
399% 6,440 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,369
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 59.7
49% 59.7 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 179%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZPLJ12THALA-00007 13TB
11.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EPK9CB5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3144 3169 3181 3184 3157 3136 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 2,504
Mixed 1483
SusWrite 3,162
477% 2,087 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 62.7
208% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 734
551% 738 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 339%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4Z3600C18 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 67
MC Write 66.5
MC Mixed 82.9
206% 72.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 35.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 178%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH II EXTREME Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $3,265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback