Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180424
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	60% Good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 132 57% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 351 35% 286 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.9% Average	Lighting 50.5 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 69.2 41% 58.2 fps	MRender 55.1 Gravity 56 Splatting 41 40% 50.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM81.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 179 188 172 175 182 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 154 Write 117 Mixed 115 SusWrite 176 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 15.1 62% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 23.7 18% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 893GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 154 157 160 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 173 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 158 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 333, 333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 0.9 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	123x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	64x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	38x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	49x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16