Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 135% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	115.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200903
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '22 at 11:53
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 266 86% 160 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 962 85% 720 Pts	64-Core 1,426 88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	159% Outstanding	Lighting 215 Reflection 208 Parallax 238 176% 220 fps	MRender 269 Gravity 220 Splatting 159 170% 216 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 77 78 77 82 85 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.2% Average	Read 216 Write 130 Mixed 164 SusWrite 81 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 24.8 81% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 63.8 DQ Write 42.8 DQ Mixed 51.4 39% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 723GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 78 79 78 83 86 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 215 Write 130 Mixed 163 SusWrite 82.3 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 24.7 81% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 60.1 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 50.2 38% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 344GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 78 78 77 82 85 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 219 Write 130 Mixed 165 SusWrite 81.3 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 25.1 82% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 60.3 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 50.9 38% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 129%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB 2,378 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: MJAOA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 79 80 79 84 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 144 Write 124 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 82.5 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB 2,378 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 77 78 77 82 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 156 Write 123 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 80.7 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 92%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4TB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 168 165 154 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 132 Write 136 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 165 158% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.8 188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GB 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 30.2 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 32.5 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 177%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,030x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	743x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	562x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	561x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	368x
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	341x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	418x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	353x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	219x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	127x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	110x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,262

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16