Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3612QM 11,760 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 85 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 154 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 380 40% 320 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1477) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 2.7 3% 4.67 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 285 280 292 149 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 376 Write 371 Mixed 317 SusWrite 247 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 27.7 95% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 272 204% 273 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 124%
SD Card 64GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 23GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 19.6 Write 16.2 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 16.1 23% 17 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 2.8 187% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.9% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.9 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	122x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	59x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	15x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	13x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,616 samples	13x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448