Acer Extensa 215-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220701
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 00:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 297
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 673
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Acer(1025 1465) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 27.4
21% 26.5 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 18.7
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1853 2239 933 658 677 657 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,387
Write 2,424
Mixed 1,710
SusWrite 1,169
431% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 97.6
321% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1230
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1,112
838% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 317%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 14.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-54G Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback