Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 23:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$97
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 814
76% 631 Pts
64-Core 1,002
62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 98.9
Parallax 89.5
81% 95.8 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 78.3
72% 89.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4200102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 457 458 457 301 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 433
Mixed 406
SusWrite 384
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 48.2
157% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 260
214% 308 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
219GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 147 148 147 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 142
Write 108
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 148
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
15GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 110 115 112 113 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 68.8
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 110
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 4000 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 19.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback