bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DZ77BH-55K
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 15:35
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 93
2-Core 181
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 316
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 49 41 42 31 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 94.6
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 46.6
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 73%
BUFFALO HD-PXTU2 319GB
1GB free, PID 01a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 22 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 16
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 21.4
24% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030EB68F9W1600 Kingston 9905474-019.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Kingston 9905474-019.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback