Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 236
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 659
65% 532 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 86.4
Parallax 80.7
71% 84.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 70.6
68% 85.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 396 405 406 450 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 452
Mixed 427
SusWrite 425
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 45
144% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 298
245% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Amd-raid WD_BLACK SN750 S 1TB
517GB free
Firmware: 7111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1919 1999 1955 886 209 202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,392
Write 1973
Mixed 1,618
SusWrite 1,195
350% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 46.6
169% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 683
DQ Mixed 788
548% 679 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 208%
Great: 333%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
521GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 78
Write 83.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 90.3
51% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 32.8
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback