HP 400-335d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 400-335d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 12:36
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 352
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 107
Parallax 0.3
92% 73.7 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 100
Splatting 94.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 19 62 3.2 2.8 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 432
Write 354
Mixed 294
SusWrite 47.3
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 8.4
50% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 40.5
45% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
651GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 204 204 203 196 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 116
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 200
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
WD Game Drive 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 29.9
Write 21.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 23.6
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 400-335d Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 400-335d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback