Asus G501JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus G501JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G501JW
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 09:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 97
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 500
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 18DD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4062
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.9
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s SATA M.2 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2170002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 129 114 121 95 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 444
Write 210
Mixed 222
SusWrite 125
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 33.4
124% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 142
138% 221 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
894GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 104 103 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 104
63% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF Samsung 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 14.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G501JW Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G501JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback