Toshiba Satellite L510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L510  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 08:33
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 81.3
41% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FF16) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 176 198 133 51 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 236
Write 212
Mixed 213
SusWrite 129
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 9.4
42% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 18.5
44% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
136GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 48.3
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 39.8
33% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5428-078.A00LF HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L510 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback