Asus 1025C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 1025C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1025C
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 07:42
Run Duration385 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2800
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 48
1-Core 6
2-Core 12.1
19% 22 Pts
4-Core 21.4
8-Core 22
3% 21.7 Pts
64-Core 22.3
1% 22.3 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 77 78 79 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 45.5
Write 66.4
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 71.4
36% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1025C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1025C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback