_________________________________

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	__ ___________________________________ (all builds)
Motherboard	__ ____
Memory	6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220412
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '22 at 23:13
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Not Available 40 User benchmarks, average bench 96% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 133 2-Core 264 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 506 68% 506 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% HP(103C 8701) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 152 Parallax 160 109% 149 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 130 Splatting 118 109% 136 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 123%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 778GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 136 96 166 161 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 166 Write 20 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 148 68% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ___________________________________ Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 108%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: _________________________________

CPU
AvailableNotBench 96%, 40 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 130% - Outstanding

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

__ ___________________________________

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: __ ___________________________________

Feedback

_________________________________

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

System: _________________________________