PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160226 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 23 '17 at 19:58 |
Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia NVS 310
Nvidia(10DE 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 387.92
|
||||
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 KHX1600C9D3/4 99U5403-050.A 99U5403-050.A 16GB
800, 800, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
48%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 230x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 225x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 147x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 48x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 47x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $549 |