HP EliteBook 1040 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 75% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 1040 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 896D
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 75%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
83% 157 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 750
71% 590 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 896D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1314
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 24.2
18% 23.4 fps
MRender 19.1
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 19.5
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1032 664 599 1218 1453 1430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 1,376
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 1066
272% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 51.4
152% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 562
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 477
337% 434 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 172%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 30.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 21.5
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 1040 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 1040 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback