Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q7010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3813-A1
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 08:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400T
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 664
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1259) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1940 991 807 806 808 811 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2189
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 1,027
374% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 68.2
220% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 648
474% 631 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 257%
Great: 306%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
79GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO Q7010 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback