Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBase_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME  (all builds)
MotherboardETI 132-SE-E775
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 05:40
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 483
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 3688) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 55.2
34% 45 fps
MRender 51.3
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 42.2
39% 48.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 221 242 243 245 249 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 461
Write 248
Mixed 166
SusWrite 234
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 19.7
84% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 54.9
104% 212 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 139 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 129
Mixed 118
SusWrite 139
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 85%
Corsair Slider 3.0 124GB
28GB free, PID 1a06
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 35 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 100
Write 50.3
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 34.4
63% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
136% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X21 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MODEL_NAME Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback