Asus P5VD2-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive11.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5VD2-VM  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 11:01
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 4400-$108
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 25.6
2-Core 51.7
30% 44 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 37.2
6% 42.8 Pts
64-Core 50.5
3% 50.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1
Asus(1043 81CE) 64MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX64.dll Ver. 8.14.14.87
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.3
0% 0.15 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 87 35 6.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.7% Very poor
Read 70.8
Write 68.5
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 34.1
12% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 7.7
21% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung SP1613N 160GB
148GB free
Firmware: VB100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 27 24 29 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 27.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 24.3
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5VD2-VM Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5VD2-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $54
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback