Login H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLogin H81M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardLogin H81M-C
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 04:29
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 351
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 63
54% 65.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 61.2
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 153 25 105 110 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 418
Write 346
Mixed 297
SusWrite 117
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 16.2
65% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 44.6
50% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
672GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 152 153 154 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 146
Mixed 134
SusWrite 151
112% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
16GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 5.8 6.5 5.7 6.1 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 7.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.2
12% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
103% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GDE.AU10C Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Login H81M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback