Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E781

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E781  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB222
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130419
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 16:19
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 146
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 190
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 199 209 201 198 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 376
Write 245
Mixed 252
SusWrite 197
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 23.7
72% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 133
132% 214 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-144.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E781 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E781

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback