MSI 880GMS-E41(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 880GMS-E41(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '17 at 13:07
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 113
49% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 252
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 089C) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 8.72
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 14.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 288
Write 289
Mixed 264
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 17.4
84% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 16.8
20% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
656GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 67.9
Write 79.3
Mixed 78.2
57% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GMS-E41(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 880GMS-E41(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback