HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 09:11
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 160
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 442
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 59.4
0% 31.4 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 24.4
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 65 78 77 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 88.3
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 71.9
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 77%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
21GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 82 82 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 75.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 82.8
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 76%
Mass Storage Device 250GB
64GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 19.9
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 24.7
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback