Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 44.7 31% 43.4 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 61.7 8% 61.5 Pts	64-Core 60.6 4% 60.6 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T2531TB 1TB 2,650 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 801GB free (System drive) Firmware: V060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 370 351 369 351 372 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 421 Write 309 Mixed 354 SusWrite 362 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 13.9 60% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 32.1 50% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 104%
WDC WD10 JPVX-00JC3T0 1TB 793GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 40 38 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.9% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 35.3 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 38.6 46% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
SHARETRONIC 2x8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	972x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	159x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	31x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	25x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16