MSI B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39)

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7C39
Motherboard	MSI B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39) (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211117
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '22 at 19:56
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 246 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 720 75% 604 Pts	64-Core 699 43% 699 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 43.1 Parallax 39.8 32% 40.7 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 28.5 28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WDS240G2G0C- 240GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231800WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 130 133 134 134 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 1,367 Write 1,002 Mixed 1,083 SusWrite 171 202% 906 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 68.5 255% 97.8 MB/s	DQ Read 647 DQ Write 822 DQ Mixed 536 460% 668 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 176%
Samsung PSSD T7 Touch 1TB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 0GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 329 351 352 359 254 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 312 Write 332 Mixed 325 SusWrite 328 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 28.3 91% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 35.9 65% 128 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 95%
Sandisk Portable SSD 1TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free Firmware: 0305 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 180 226 237 220 183 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 353 Write 319 Mixed 153 SusWrite 214 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 9.5 47% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 94.8 DQ Mixed 11.2 34% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$49 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 926GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 129 129 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	69% Good	Read 112 Write 122 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 129 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 76%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 99GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 45.8 Mixed 26 SusWrite 63.7 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 54%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 975GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 95 95 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 83.6 Write 83.8 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 94.3 98% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 114GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9 4 21 6.3 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 64.6 Write 35.1 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 10.5 44% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 1x16GB 904 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39) Builds (Compare 3,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: MSI B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,312x
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	499x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	296x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	352x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	214x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	203x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	143x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	106x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	103x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	197x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	165x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16