ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30BCS11Y00

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Lenovo 30BCS11Y00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 1038
Memory	373.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '22 at 15:59
Run Duration	392 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6254 50 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 76.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 939 83% 706 Pts	64-Core 2,484 154% 2,484 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000 738 User benchmarks, average bench 205% Legend(17AA 1459) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 472.39 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.3% Below average	Lighting 43.8 Reflection 36 Parallax 41.1 36% 40.3 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 35 Splatting 24.9 26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 174% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 218%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB 10,512 User benchmarks, average bench 188% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5M2QEXH7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,056 Write 2,002 Mixed 1,413 406% 1,824 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 57.7 214% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 854 DQ Mixed 981 720% 943 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 2TB free Firmware: 4M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2055 2047 2041 2048 2049 2053 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	322% Outstanding	Read 2105 Write 2,038 Mixed 1,646 SusWrite 2,049 442% 1,960 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 58.2 206% 75.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,178 DQ Write 1,027 DQ Mixed 1,102 826% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 322% Great: 369%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 2TB free Firmware: 4M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2099 2097 2095 2107 2101 2094 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	331% Outstanding	Read 2,141 Write 2,080 Mixed 1,741 SusWrite 2,099 454% 2,015 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 63.7 236% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1,082 DQ Write 930 DQ Mixed 1,008 755% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 331% Great: 369%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TB 523 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 2TB free Firmware: 4M2QEXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2058 2058 2053 2057 2056 2055 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	322% Outstanding	Read 2083 Write 2,037 Mixed 1,659 SusWrite 2,056 442% 1,959 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 57.7 212% 78.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,171 DQ Write 1,021 DQ Mixed 1,091 819% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 322% Great: 369%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G9E2 12x31.9GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 12 of 16 slots used 383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 81.2 MC Mixed 55.8 174% 60.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 30BCS11Y00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 173%

UFO

Desktop

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation

Workstation 224%

UFO

System: Lenovo 30BCS11Y00

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 62541stBench 85%, 50 samples	1x

GPU
RTX A6000NvidiaBench 205%, 738 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLB2T0HALB-000L7 2TBSamsungBench 277%, 523 samples	1x

RAM
36ASF4G72PZ-2G9E2 12x31.9GBMicronBench 127%, 12 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback